#Difficult decisions how to
#Difficult decisions code
#Difficult decisions trial

Their courtroom experience motivates them to serve willingly on juries when called. They interact with the human face of the justice system – judges, attorneys, and other professionals – and they gain exposure to careers in the courts. They experience the differences between media portrayals and real courtroom situations. They have a heightened awareness of situations they may not realize can have legal and long-term consequences.

Students leave the program before lunchtime with sharpened tools for civil discourse and decision making. All preparation is incorporated into the courtroom event. Note to Teachers: There is no reading or pre-court preparation on the part of students or their teachers. All preparation is incorporated into the courtroom event.Ĭourtroom Program: Approximately three hours – from orientation to adjournment. Teachers' time commitment: No classroom preparation for students or teachers. Students Have a Candid Conversation with a Judge on Any Topic of Concern Participants Analyze Everyday Decisions That Could Have Long-Term Consequences Students Observe, Learn, Practice Civil Discourse Skills with a Judge and Lawyers The Focus is on Jury Deliberations Involving All Students and Learning Styles The Courtroom Experience is a Realistic Hearing on a Timely Issue

#Difficult decisions trial

The activity is different from a mock trial in the following ways: The centerpiece is jury deliberations in which students practice the civil discourse skills they observe and learn from the judge and attorneys in a courtroom.

Jurors (doc): These students deliberate and work toward an evidence-based decision.

Attorneys (doc): These students present arguments before the judge.

These coaches prepare the student jurors (doc) for the centerpiece of the program – jury deliberations during which they use civil discourse skills to analyze the issues. These coaches prepare for the student attorneys (doc) for the oral arguments.

Judge (doc): The host judge presides over the simulation and converses with the students in the courtroom after the event.

Facilitator (doc): The facilitator manages the courtroom program and gives everyone an opportunity to speak during the jury deliberations.

This activity includes a tailored description and detailed guidance for each role: This activity can be used with any case in the Educational Resources section. Get started by downloading the agenda and complete activity package (doc). In other cases, all students serve as judges who ask questions of the student attorneys, then have a case conference to come to a decision. These court hearings (not mock trials) now are being conducted in the distance-learning environment. In some cases, all students serve as jurors who listen to the student attorneys’ arguments, then actively deliberate in the courtroom.

#Difficult decisions code

Proposed Changes to Code and JC&D RulesĬivil Discourse and Difficult Decisions is a national initiative of the federal courts that brings high school and college students into federal courthouses for legal proceedings that arise from situations in which law-abiding young people can find themselves.Confidentiality Regulations for Pretrial Services Information.Privacy Policy for Electronic Case Files.

Special Projects of the Rules Committees.

Preliminary Drafts of Proposed Rule Amendments.

Congressional and Supreme Court Rules Packages.

Permitted Changes to Official Bankruptcy Forms.

Open Meetings and Hearings of the Rules Committee.

#Difficult decisions how to

How to Submit Input on a Pending Proposal.

How to Suggest a Change to Federal Court Rules and Forms.

Laws and Procedures Governing the Work of the Rules Committees.

Proposed Amendments Published for Public Comment.

Pending Changes in the Bankruptcy Forms.

Long Range Plan for Information Technology.

Judiciary Conferences That Cost More Than $100,000.

Journalist’s Guide to the Federal Courts.

Statistical Tables for the Federal Judiciary.

Electronic Public Access Public User Group.

Transfer of Excess Judiciary Personal Property.

National Court Interpreter Database (NCID) Gateway.

Federal Court Interpreter Certification Examination.

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Fees.

Archives of the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability.

FAQs: Filing a Judicial Conduct or Disability Complaint Against a Federal Judge.

Roadways to the Federal Bench: Who Me? A Bankruptcy or Magistrate Judge?.

Chronological History of Authorized Judgeships - District Courts.

Chronological History of Authorized Judgeships - Courts of Appeals.

Fact Sheet for Workplace Protections in the Federal Judiciary.

Director of Workplace Relations Contacts by Circuit.

Administrative Oversight and Accountability.